What action is most likely for a 3rd violation of regulatory standards in Category E?

The appropriate action for a 3rd violation of regulatory standards in Category E is the revocation of the license. This indicates that the regulatory body takes repeated violations seriously and aims to uphold the integrity of the profession. A third violation signifies a pattern of non-compliance, suggesting that the individual has not corrected their behavior despite previous warnings or penalties.

Revocation effectively removes the individual's ability to practice in their field, emphasizing the importance of adherence to regulatory standards in order to protect public interest and ensure that licensed professionals meet the required ethical and operational guidelines. By implementing this severe consequence for repeated violations, regulatory entities can maintain higher standards within the industry and deter further infractions.

Probation and suspension, while significant consequences, typically do not reflect the severity associated with a third violation in this context. Lifetime revocation is an extremely stringent measure, typically reserved for the most egregious offenses rather than a repeated failure to comply with regulatory standards. Thus, the approach taken for a third violation is clearly defined as revocation of the license.